Neuroscience News logo for mobile.

Human Echolocators Can Better Locate Targets From Sideways Rather Than Straight Ahead

Summary: Humans who use echolocation have better acuity in localizing a target from 45 degrees to the side compared to directly ahead at 0 degrees.

Source: University of Durham

Novel research conducted by scientists from Durham University, UK, University of Birmingham, UK, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands and Placentia, USA have discovered for the first time that human echolocators have better acuity in localizing a target from 45° off to the side as compared to from straight ahead at 0°.

The researchers tested echo-localization abilities of nine blind adult human experts who use this skill on a daily basis.

They discovered that echolocation performance is drastically improved at 45° where the participants can better locate targets based on echoes coming from sideways.

Their research findings indicate that human echolocation and human regular spatial hearing might be governed by different principles as regular hearing is best from straight ahead at 0° and gets worse as targets move further to the side.

The researchers point out that human echolocation and regular hearing may rely on different acoustic cues, and that human spatial hearing has more facets than previously thought.

The researchers also characterized and analyzed the clicking behavior of the participants and found that participants made quieter clicks when they receive stronger echo signals coming from sideways at a 45° angle.

The researchers tested echo-localisation abilities of nine blind adult human experts who use this skill on a daily basis. Credit: University of Durham

Full results of the study have been published in the journal Psychological Science.

Lead author of the paper, Dr Lore Thaler of Durham University, said: “There is still a lot to discover about human echolocation, and about human perceptual abilities more generally. Our findings show that there are facets of human spatial hearing that we did not know before.”

The researchers further established that better human echo-localisation away from straight ahead is consistent with what has been observed in bats.

This is surprising because bats possess anatomical and neural specialisations for echolocation, which humans do not have. To nonetheless find such behavioral similarity suggests that both humans and bats may have similar sensing strategies.

The research findings shed new light on human echolocation capabilities that provide more details and useful guidance for echolocation instructors and new users where they can turn their head away to locate objects and targets more accurately.

About this echolocation research news

Author: Araf Din
Source: University of Durham
Contact: Araf Din – University of Durham
Image: The image is in the public domain

Original Research: Closed access.
“Human Echolocators Have Better Localization Off Axis” by Lore Thaler et al. Psychological Science

See also

This shows a brain

Abstract

Human Echolocators Have Better Localization Off Axis

Here, we report novel empirical results from a psychophysical experiment in which we tested the echolocation abilities of nine blind adult human experts in click-based echolocation.

We found that they had better acuity in localizing a target and used lower intensity emissions (ie, mouth clicks) when a target was placed 45° off to the side compared with when it was placed at 0° (straight ahead).

We provide a possible explanation of the behavioral result in terms of binaural-intensity signals, which appear to change more rapidly around 45°.

The finding that echolocators have better echo-localization off axis is surprising, because for human source localization (ie, regular spatial hearing), it is well known that performance is best when targets are straight ahead (0°) and decreases as targets move farther to the side.

This may suggest that human echolocation and source hearing rely on different acoustic cues and that human spatial hearing has more facets than previously thought.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.